Skip to content
Freedom Coin
EN
English · all marketsEnglish (Ireland)English (Canada)FrançaisEspañol日本語ItalianoDeutsch (Schweiz)ČeštinaBahasa Indonesia

Freedom Coin evidence rules for AI-trading brand analysis

This policy controls who writes a brand analysis, which sources support it, how uncertainty is stated and what commercial influence cannot change.

Authorship and accountability

Every AI-trading brand analysis is assigned to an author listed on the Freedom Coin authors page. The visible byline, author profile and structured data identify the same person; anonymous or invented bylines are not used.

The author owns the conclusion and must distinguish direct observation, primary records, operator statements and unverified marketing claims. Assignment follows the risks raised by the brand rather than a random rotation.

Claims that require direct support

Operator identity, official domains, licences, minimum deposits, fees, withdrawal rules, broker relationships and enforcement actions are tied to dated sources. Primary records receive more weight than summaries or promotional pages.

Returns, win rates, accuracy, user counts, awards and security certifications are not repeated as Freedom Coin findings without a traceable method and source. Missing evidence remains visible instead of being filled with an industry average.

Research and language assistance

Research and language tools can organise documents, compare records and translate text. They cannot become the named author, supply missing brand facts or convert an unsupported claim into evidence.

Before deployment, the publishing workflow validates identity fields, links, dates, source attribution, market-specific legal context and consistency between visible text and structured data. The named byline remains accountable for the published conclusion and receives a direct corrections channel.